The American & Mexican Legislative System Compared:Sistemul Legislativ American Vs Sistemul Legislativ Mexican Lazin Amparo

November 14, 2014

O comparatie analitica a sistemului Legislativ American vs Sistemul Legislativ Mexican si Romanesc, bazat pe Codul Roman Latin, invechit: Lazin Amparo:

Pe Slideshare: The AMERICAN LEGISLATION COmpared to the Mexican Legislative SYSTEM:"

<a href="//www.slideshare.net/olazin/lazin-amparohabeas-comparedmay08-1546699" title="Lazin Amparo

<iframe src="//www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/1546699" width="425" height="355" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border:1px solid #CCC; border-width:1px; margin-bottom:5px; max-width: 100%;" allowfullscreen> </iframe> <div style="margin-bottom:5px"> <strong> <a href="//www.slideshare.net/olazin/lazin-amparohabeas-comparedmay08-1546699" title="Lazin Amparo&Habeas Compared,May08" target="_blank">Lazin Amparo&Habeas Compared,May08</a> </strong> from <strong><a href="//www.slideshare.net/olazin" target="_blank">UCLA</a></strong> </div>

------------

Fight hard for SOCIA SECURITY EXPANSION MY FELLOW AMERICANS:



	Dr Olgà Lazin wants you to rally for SS. Democrats have historically been the party of Social Security and champions of the Middle Class—so what happened last Tuesday? Social Security Works’ founding co-directors Nancy Altman and Eric Kingson have just recently published an analysis of the election and a rallying call for the American people to fight for big ideas, to create the country we want to live in, and to fight to expand Social Security. They said: "Too much of the national Democratic brand has been, in President Truman's words, "a Republican in Democratic clothing" on the vital issue of the future of Social Security. Cheered on by the Third Way, Fix The Debt, and other Wall Street-funded lobbying organizations, as well as the Washington Post and other elite media, many Democrats followed the leadership of the Administration, casting their lot with false-centrist Republican-lite policies and rhetoric regarding Social Security." In an interview with Social Security on the morning of the election, Senator Boxer barbara said: "Half of the families in our country today have less than $10,000 in the bank. And if you’re thinking of retiring with a shred of dignity, you know that Social Security needs to be strengthened and you know it needs to be expanded. What our strategy should be is to get on the offensive and say, “of course we’re not going to cut Social Security, but our goal is to expand Social Security and there are very simple ways we can do that.” In this election, we saw the way Karl Rove used weak support of the Bowles-Simpson plan as a cudgel against leniant/lazy Democrats who stood for nothing. Crossroads GPS ran ads muddying the water about Republicans’ offers to cut Social Security. He attacked Democrats for compromising on cuts to earned benefits to appease the Republicans. As Nancy and Eric Holdersay: “There is nothing ‘centrist’ about cutting Social Security. There is no large segment of the US population for which cutting Social Security is popular, left, center or right. As a recent write-up of a Pew survey on increasing polarization in America put it, “Americans are divided on everything, except their love of Social Security.” NOW OR NEVER, as you can see, our work continues Sysyfikly. We now face a Republican-led Congress with leadership who have repeatedly stated their desire to cut Social Security. They will wilt away only in the face of united and fierce opposition from the American people. So what we have to do now is very clear: turn up the volume and make sure they hear us loud and clear, Expand Social Security Now! Thank you, Social Security PROJECT @ UCLA.