Fwd: Comunicate senator Viorel Badea_APCE - olgalazin@gmail.com - Gmail

Fwd: Comunicate senator Viorel Badea_APCE - olgalazin@gmail.com - Gmail:

Free Trade Agreement of North America (NAFTA) and the European Union (EU) Summary of provisions.
NAFTA	UE
Goals	Market trade in goods	Transnational criteria to create step by step a political, economic and population union.
Activity	Each member sets its own subject to external political negotiations.	The Council of Ministers (the main decision-making body representing all countries) makes decisions applicable to all members.
Currency	Each member has its own currency.	Members have established a common currency unit (ECU) but each country still has its own currency. Under the Maastricht Treaty, it was scheduled that ECU be the single monetary unit for 1999.
Duties	Each country retains its own tariff regulations.	Members were united in a single market since 1 January 1993. Capital, goods and services are moving between EU countries. There is a commitment to abolish internal migration controls, but some countries have postponed their fulfillment.
Transport	Authorizes trucks and cargo, except to travel between countries. (El tráfico camioneroen cruzará la frontera xcepta libremente para 1999.) (The truck traffic will cross the border freely, but until 1999.)	It was established a common policy for a block without borders and the full opening of transport routes, except the truck traffic is prohibited in the Swiss and Austrian Alps.
Employment	Workers are not included.	Workers can move freely among the member countries.
Migration and Citizenship	Only professionals, business people and investors, have the right to work in the member states.	Citizens of EU countries have guaranteed freedom of movement and residence. Citizens vote for the European Parliament in theirs place of residence regardless citizenship. Passports in color red are being introduced to give the EU citizens.
Free Trade agreements with other non-members countries	Not covered.	Trade agreements are signed by the Union and not by individual countries.
Foreign policy	Not covered.	Members are committed with a common foreign policy, but few countries actually seek to ensure full compliance.
Inflation and macroeconomic Administration	Not covered.	The member countries must adhere to the maximal limits.
Competence and quality	Not covered.	Members agreed to establish common strategies to make all countries equally competitive. The quality standards are minimal.
Consumer protection	Not covered.	Members are adhered to standard regulations that are being established.
Social policy	Not covered.	Standard criteria are applied to all countries (eg, social security).
Tax Legislation	It covers only the Double Tax Treaty.	It established a standard guideline for all members. Special privileges are granted to help economically disadvantaged areas such as Spain and Portugal. Finland and Austria will benefit by becoming members.
Environment	Participants are establishing common standards in lateral treaties.	Members have established a foreign policy of standards and measures.
Health	Not covered.	Members have established a common program.
Education	Although NAFTA is an economic union, it has emerged a lateral agreement, but not at the same level for the ERASMUS program.	Exchange programs for students in higher education and academics are established. The Erasmus program supports students who study up a year in another EU country.
Defense	Not covered.	Members seek to develop a common security policy. It has established a common military system, but each country retains its own militia.

1.    Population, production and exports index of European Union 1
Country	Population (thousands)	Gross Domestic Product (millions of dollars)	GDP per capita (dollars)	GDP proportion dedicated to export
Germany2	80,553	1,846,064	23,030	24
Austria	7,906	174,767	22,110	41
Belgium	10,039	209,594	20,880	73
Denmark	5,166	133,941	25,930	37
Spain	39,077	547,947	14,020	17
Finland	5,062	116,309	22,980	22
France	57,338	1,278,652	22,300	23
Greece	10,454	75,106	7,180	23
Ireland	3,536	42,798	12,100	62
Italy	57,844	1,186,568	20,510	20
Luxembourg	389	13,716	35,260	94
Netherlands	15,167	312,340	20,590	54
Portugal	9,843	73,336	7,450	35
United Kingdom	57,701	1,024,769	17,760	24
Sweden	8,707	233,209	26,780	28
15 countries	368,782	7,269,116	19,6583	27c
12 countries	347,107	6,978,040	20,1034	25c

1.    Population, production and exports index of Eastern Europe
Country	Population (thousands)	Gross Domestic Product (millions of dollars)	GDP per capita (dollars)	GDP proportion dedicated to export
Bulgaria	8,952	11,906	1,330	45
Hungria	10,202	30,671	3,010	33
Polonia	38,365	75,268	1,960	19
Republica Checa	10,383	25,313	2,440	58
Republica Slovaca	5,346	10,249	1,920	28
Rumania	22,865	24,865	1,090	28
Total	96,113	178,272	1,854a	305

1.    Population, production and exports index of North America
Country	Population (thousands)	Gross Domestic Product (millions of dollars)	GDP per capita (dollars)	GDP proportion dedicated to export
Canada	27,844	565,787	20,320	25
United States	255,414	5,904,822	23,120	11
Mexico	84,967	294,831	13,470	14
Total	368,225	6,765,440	18,374a	126

1.    Main global trade blocs 7
Trade bloc	Members	Population (millions)	Gross Domestic Product (millions of dollars)	GDP per capita (dollars)
TLC	3	363.3	6,404.2	17,622
SICA	6	29.5	36.0	1,222
ACS	25	198.7	474.0	2,386
G3	3	137.8	377.7	2,740
Andean Pact	5	93.8	160.1	1,707
MERCOSUR	4	191.6	544.1	2,840
European Union8	15	368.8	7,269.1	19,658
European Union	12	345.0	6,144.0	17,809
APEC	13	1,961.0	11,135.1	5,678
TLC
Mexico		83.3	282.5	3,391
United States		252.7	5,610.8	22,203
Canada		a 27.3	510.8	18,711
SICA
Costa Rica		3.1	5.6	1,796
ACS
Cuba		10.7	26.9	2,500
G3
Colombia		33.6	41.7	1,241
Andean Pact
Venezuela		20.2	53.4	2,644
MERCOSUR9
Brazil		151.4	414.1	2,735
Chile6		13.4	31.3	2,336
European Union
Germany		79.6	1,692.0	21,256
APEC
Japan		124.0	3,337.0	26,911

1.    Population and economic power index of main units of global trade in 2010
Area	Population	GNP	GNP/C
Mexico	33.0	5.0	15.3
Canada	10.8	9.1	84.3
MERCOSUR	75.8	9.7	12.8
Alemania	31.5	30.2	95.7
EU	147.6	131.5	89.1
Japon	49.0	59.5	121.2

Dr. Carlos Alberto Torres

Distinguished Professor of Education

Director Paulo Freire Institute and Associate Dean for Global Programs

Graduate School of Education and Information Studies

University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA)

President World Council of Comparative Education Societies (WCCES)

'via Blog this'------------------------

                                               
MEMORANDUM,  N  O  
T   A , aug 9, 2014

                                      
____________________

     Ma
numesc Hotico  Dan , am 56 de ani, si
locuiesc in Baia Mare , RO.

     De circa  2-3 ani incoace , din senin , mi s-a pus ca un
taifun pe cap, d.na comisar sef de politie  Marincas Viorica – Inspector  Sef  la
Inspectoratul de Politie  al Judetului
Maramures .

      Sunt una din numeroasele  victime
 ale  incompetentei manageriale a d.nei Marincas Viorica
– doctor in stiinte , in sensul ca in calitatea sa , de Sef al
politistilor  din judetul Maramures ,  nu a observat 
incompetenta profesionala a subordonatilor sai , in frunte cu d.l comisar
sef de politie Gherman  Dorin  - Sef al Politiei rutiere ptr. judetul
Maramures, care  in mod abuziv si ilegal
mi-au suspendat dreptul de a conduce autovehicule pe drumurile publice, desi
dupa 24 ore s-a dovedit ca fapta nu exista , dupa care mi-au facut dosar penal
ptr. conducere  in conditiile in care aveam  suspendat dreptul la conducere  ocazie cu care mi-au inscenat un  ultraj 
impotriva  agentului  de politie  rutiera , care in alergare   s-a impiedicat si a cazut de unul singur.   

       D.na  Marincas
V. , se face ca nu vede  incompetenta si abuzul subordonatilor,
desi s-ar fi impus sa ia atitudine si masuri  corespunzatoare ptr. indreptarea greselilor si
abuzului , precum si pedepsirea celor vinovati, daca jurnalistii ori o agentie
de investigatii , ar fi  adus marturii
despre aceste fapte  .

      Acum eu sunt nevoit ca sa adun materiale si
marturii ale subalternilor pentru a dovedi masinatiile ei nefaste.

       Pentru ca nu s-a intamplat asa , consider ca
d.na Marincas V. a dorit sa-i acopere  si
 sa-i protejeze pe subordonatii sai , iar
pe de alta parte  sa se razbune pe mine ,
lasandu-ma pedepsit pe nedrept , ca in cele din urma sa ajung  sa fiu pedepsit penal , la un an de
inchisoare cu suspendare , ptr. conducere 
cu permisul suspendat .

       D.na
Marincas V. doreste sa se razbune pe mine si pe familia mea, ptr ca sotia mea
lucreaza ca ofiter superior in unitatea  S.I.P.I.
Maramures, si banuieste ca sotia mea a cules informatii despre activitatea
acesteia si le-a transmis la Bucuresti, la unitatea centrala .

       Ura
ei este foarte personala , si are radacini  in gelozia profesionala.

       D.na Marincas V. i-a cerut , si l-a motivat
, pe agentul de politie – Bude Claudiu , care in ultima zi a termenului de
prescriptie , sa depuna  plangere
impotriva mea , ptr. ultraj contra autoritatii , si totodata  a  motivat  in  scris
toate criticile aduse de mine politistilor 
,  justificand  legalitatea masurilor luate de Bude Claudiu si
Pocol Dinu , impotriva mea.

       
Cred ca d.na marincas Viorica a promis 
protectie  politistilor  Bude Claudiu si Pocol Dinu  , ptr. greselile lor , cu conditia ca sa
depuna si sa sustina  plangerea  ptr. ultraj contra  autoritatii.

       
Asa se explica de ce nu au fost sanctionati politistii si de ce nu s-au
luat masuri de indreptare a erorilor si gresililor facute de ei – in cazul meu
.

    Prin
astfel de metode , d.na Marincas V. incurajeaza 
incompetenta profesionala  in
randul subordonatilor , determina servilismul  si incurajeaza slugarnicia in relatiile si
raporturile de munca in randul cadrelor active.

    Pentru a-si duce planul de razbunare pana la capat , d.na Marincas
V. a dat dispozitie subordonatilor sa
reactiveze , cu prioritate o ANONIMA  - 
aflata in nelucrare  din anul
2012  si uitata  in sertarele 
Politiei , in conditiile in care astfel de sesizari nu pot constitui
motiv de  cercetare  si tragere la raspundere penala, numai in
conditiile in care datele  rezultate din
investigarea cazului pot fi  coroborate
cu alte sesizari care privesc acelasi subiect si fapta .

      Anonima
–  se pare ca este conceputa de o
persoana care avea niste date foarte exacte si concrete ale unor persoane, care
nu puteau fi obtinute decat din baza de date informatizata a Politiei !?!
(persoane pe care defapt eu nici nu le cunosc personal) -  priveste 
de  fapte comise in perioada 2008
– 2010 si se refera la incadrarea unor persoane fara contract de munca la o
societate  - UKRO   Security 
SRL  ,  unde am fost administrator, societate care acum
este dizolvata si lichidata, urmand  a  fi  radiata din registrul comertului .

       Cu
toate ca probele administrate sunt incomplete si neconcludente , organele de
urmarire penala au dispus calcularea unui prejudiciu estimativ , bazat pe
declaratii de martori fara sa fie coroborate cu date contabile concrete .

       Pe baza acestui prejudiciu estimativ organele
de urmarire penala au dispus masuri asiguratorii asupra unor bunuri care nu
sunt in proprietatea mea.

       Toate acestea s-au facut din dispozitia d.nei
Marincas V., care a adus politisti de acasa ,  le-a intrerupt concediu(numitul Pop Petru)
si  i-a rechemat la munca , ca sa
continue cercetarile , sa rezolve  dosarul 
si sa finalizeze cercetarile cat mai repede in acest dosar , ocazie cu
care mi-a si spus „ce sa fac daca te-ai pus cu cine nu trebuia”

     Cred
ca intentia acestei doamne este aceea de a ma condamna, si sa trimita cat mai
repede dosarul meu in instanta cu proprunere  de  condamnare
 cu executare  in regim de detentie , fiindca se vor  conexa  cele doua pedepse si  se  va
schimba  modalitatea de executare  , din pedeapsa cu suspendare  , in pedeapsa cu executare in regim de
detentie.

      Asa
cum se poate constata , si eu ca si altii sunt o victima a razbunarii d.nei
Marincas V. , a servilismului si slugarniciei , pe care o practica in randul
subordonatilor sai , pe care-i foloseste ptr. a-si satisface vanitatea si
interesele personale.

     
Mentinerea in functie a Sefului Politiei rutiere  - d.l comisar sef  Gherman Dorin 
, in conditiile in care acesta nu stie sa aplice  corect dispozitiile codului rutier si abuzeaza
de functia sa ptr. a implementa  in
cazierul auto , masuri  care au fost  dispuse  abuziv  si
ilegal , este o dovada de  neprofesionalism  de  care
 sus-numitii fac dovada zilnic.

         Eu,
Hotico Dan, consider ca sunt o victima a acestor abuzuri la adresa drepturilor
legale garantate de Constitutia Romaniei. Semnat

 august 6, 2015