Dr Olga Lazin Academic Coaching Services - UCLA
olgalazin@gmail.com
http://www.olgalazin.com
The BIG SHORT; they deeemed demonic sellers of Stock; big short - Google Search
Get link
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
the big short - Google Search:Four outsiders in the world of high-finance who predicted the credit and housing bubble collapse of the mid-2000s decide to take on the big banks for their lack of foresight and greed
COMPLEX manuvers which have never been explained in books, or in schools.
George Santayana famously remarked that “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” What he didn’t point out was that some people want to repeat the past — and that such people have an interest in making sure that we don’t remember what happened, or that we remember it wrong.
Sure enough, some commission members sought to block consideration of any historical account that might support efforts to rein in runaway bankers. As one of those members, Peter Wallison of the American Enterprise Institute, wrote to a fellow Republican on the commission, it was important that what they said “not undermine the ability of the new House G.O.P. to modify or repeal Dodd-Frank,” the financial regulations introduced in 2010. Never mind what really happened; the party line, literally, required telling stories that would help Wall Street do it all over again.
Which brings me to a new movie the enemies of financial regulation really, really don’t want you to see.
“The Big Short” is based on the Michael Lewis book of the same name, one of the few real best-sellers to emerge from the financial crisis. I saw an early screening, and I think it does a terrific job of making Wall Street skulduggery entertaining, of exploiting the inherent black humor of how it went down.
The film achieves this feat mainly by personalizing the tale, focusing not on abstractions but on colorful individuals who saw the rot in the system and tried to make money off that realization. Of course, this still requires explaining what it was all about. Yet even the necessary expository set pieces work amazingly well. For example, we learn how dubious loans were repackaged into supposedly safe “collateralized debt obligations” via a segment in which the chef Anthony Bourdain explains how last week’s fish can be disguised as seafood stew.
But you don’t want me to play film critic; you want to know whether the movie got the underlying economic, financial and political story right. And the answer is yes, in all the ways that matter.
I could quibble over a few points: The group of people who recognized that we were experiencing the mother of all housing bubbles, and that this posed big dangers to the real economy, was bigger than the film might lead you to believe. It even included a few (cough) mainstream economists. But it is true that many influential, seemingly authoritative players, from Alan Greenspan on down, insisted not only that there was no bubble but that no bubble was even possible.
And the bubble whose existence they denied really was inflated largely via opaque financial schemes that in many cases amounted to outright fraud — and it is an outrage that basically nobody ended up being punished for those sins aside from innocent bystanders, namely the millions of workers who lost their jobs and the millions of families that lost their homes.
While the movie gets the essentials of the financial crisis right, the true story of what happened is deeply inconvenient to some very rich and powerful people. They and their intellectual hired guns have therefore spent years disseminating an alternative view that the money manager and blogger Barry Ritholtz calls the Big Lie. It’s a view that places all the blame for the financial crisis on — you guessed it — too much government, especially government-sponsored agencies supposedly pushing too many loans on the poor.
Every weekday, get thought-provoking commentary from Op-Ed columnists, The Times editorial board and contributing writers from around the world.
Never mind that the supposed evidence for this view has beenthoroughly debunked, or that before the crisis some of these same hired guns attacked those agencies not for lending too much to the poor, but for not lending enough. If the historical record runs counter to what powerful interests want you to believe, well, history will just have to be rewritten. And constant repetition, especially in captive media, keeps this imaginary history in circulation no matter how often it is shown to be false.
Sure enough, “The Big Short” has already been the subject of vitriolicattacks in Murdoch-controlled newspapers; if the movie is a commercial success and/or wins awards, expect to see much more.
The thing to remember, when you see such attacks, is why they’re taking place. The truth is that the people who made “The Big Short” should consider the attacks a kind of compliment: The attackers obviously worry that the film is entertaining enough that it will expose a large audience to the truth. Let’s hope that their fears are justified.
they can't fail. not legal or ethical; b/c they make money $$$$
Start here learning How To Be YOUR OWN BOSS: AMAZON Tutorial: My Amazon.com/olazin SITE When Listing your book, Add TITLE, SKU, ISBN, ASI, if posting BOOKS:See also: Common market REFUNDING AMAZON.COM Help Seller Central Help: Returns, Refunds, Cancelations & Claims: Tasks & Tools: Refunding Orders Refunding Orders Issuing a refund | Refund mistakes | Gift cards and gift certificates Before you issue a refund, consider the following: • After you authorize a return request, you can wait until you receive the item back from the buyer before you issue a refund. If you prefer, you can allow the buyer to keep the item even if you decide to issue a refund. • If the buyer returns the item to you damaged, or in a condition that is different from the condition in which you sent it, you have the option to issue a partial refund. If you decide to issue a partial refund, we recommend explaining this to the buyer in advance to help avoid misunderstanding or a possible
Your Quote Summary : Advanced Wellness Get the same coverage that Routine Wellness offers with added coverage for heartworm/flea prevention, dental cleaning, and more . $25 PER MONTH | $400 ANNUAL BENEFIT Add Advanced Wellness Gastion Bichon Mix, Male, Age 9 Edit Level 1 Edit Accidents & Injuries Only COVERAGE EFFECTIVE DATES: May 7, 2016 - Accidents & Injuries $250 Deductible 90% Reimbursement Level 1 Total: $14.70 Advanced Wellness Edit Advanced Preventative Care COVERAGE EFFECTIVE DATES: May 7, 2016 - Wellness Care No Deductible or Waiting Period 'via Blog this'
What is the Difference between L-Threonine and L-Theanine? : What is the Difference between L-Threonine and L-Theanine? Updated on March 25, 2010 What is the Difference between L-Threonine and L-Theanine? Both L-Threonine and L-Theanine are amino acids, and they are easily confused because their names only differ by a couple of letters. Even vitamin shop clerks confuse them and can bring you l-theanine powder instead of l-threonine capsules or vice versa. Below I’ve listed the main differences between l-threonine and l-theanine. L-threonine is an amino acid typically found in meat (especially heart, skeletal muscles) and in the nervous system. You shouldn’t confuse it with L-theanine, an amino acid found uniquely in green tea, which is a very different substance. What Does L-Threonine Do? L-Threonine is a precursor of glycine synthesis in the spinal cord and is essential for a healthy nervous system. The supplement plays an important role in the formation of collagen and elastin. Wh
Comments
Post a Comment